华南预防医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 428-432.doi: 10.13217/j.scjpm.2019.0428

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

心理干预对胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者负性情绪及生活质量影响的meta分析

廖巧玲1, 2, 李小麟1   

  1. 1.四川大学华西护理学院 华西医院,四川 成都 610041;
    2.四川省精神卫生中心 绵阳市第三人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-12 出版日期:2019-10-20 发布日期:2019-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 李小麟,E-mail:qling100@163.com
  • 作者简介:廖巧玲(1987—),女,大学本科,主管护师,主要研究方向:精神、心理护理,临床护理

Meta-analysis of effect of psychological intervention on negative emotions and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal malignant tumors

LIAO Qiao-ling1, 2, LI Xiao-lin1   

  1. 1.West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041,China;
    2.Sichuan Mental Health Center/The Third Hospital of Mianyang
  • Received:2019-06-12 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-10-20

摘要: 目的 对国内外关于心理干预对胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者负性情绪及生活质量的影响进行系统性评价。方法 对万方数据库、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、Europe PMC、Pubmed、EMbase、Web of Science和Cochrane Central等数据库2009年1月至今公开发表的关于心理干预对胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者负性情绪及生活质量的影响的报道进行检索并筛选,评价文献质量,并进行meta分析。结果 本研究共提取9篇文献,观察组共398例、对照组共398例,共纳入受试者896例,均为高质量文献;护理后SAS、SDS、EORTC QLQ-C30、SF-36评分 报道均无显著异质性(P>0.05),meta分析显示,观察组护理后SAS评分显著降低(WMD=-20.63,95%CI为-34.82~-14.57, P<0.01),SDS评分显著降低(WMD=-7.89,95%CI为-10.02~-5.63,P<0.01),EORTC QLQ-C30评分显著提高(WMD=5.67,95%CI为2.18~7.12,P<0.01),SF-36评分显著提高(WMD=3.63,95%CI为0.97~5.88, P<0.01)。各项文献间均未发现明显的偏倚风险。结论 心理干预能够显著减轻胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者焦虑、抑郁情绪,提升生活质量。

关键词: 心理干预, 恶性肿瘤, 负性情绪, 生活质量

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the impact of psychological intervention on negative emotions and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal malignant tumors at home and abroad.Methods Papers published in the databases of Wanfang, WIP Chinese Sci-tech, China How Net, China Biomedical Literature Database, European PMC, Pubmed, EMbase and Web of science and Cochrane Central from January 2009 to now on the impact of psychological intervention on negative emotions and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal malignant tumors were retrieved and screened, and the quality of literature was evaluated to conduct a meta-analysis.Results Nine literatures were extracted and they were all with high quality. A total of 896 subjects were enrolled, including 398 in the observation group and 398 in the control group. There were no significant differences in the heterogeneity test of SAS, SDS, EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36 scores after nursing (P > 0.05 for all). Meta-analysis showed that the SAS scores of the observation group were significantly decreased (WMD=-20.63, 95% CI: -34.82 - -14.57, P<0.01), SDS scores decreased significantly (WMD=-7.89, 95% CI:-10.02 - -5.63, P<0.01), EORTC QLQ-C30 scores increased significantly (WMD=5.67, 95% CI: 2.18-7.12, P<0.01), and SF-36 scores increased significantly (WMD = 3.63, 95% CI: 0.97-5.88, P<0.01).No significant risk of bias was found among the literatures.Conclusion Psychological intervention can significantly reduce anxiety and depression in patients with gastrointestinal malignant tumors, and improve their quality of life.

Key words: Psychological intervention, Malignant tumor, Negative emotion, Quality of life

中图分类号: 

  • R181.3+7