华南预防医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 529-534.doi: 10.12183/j.scjpm.2026.0529

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于安德森卫生服务利用行为模型的急性缺血性卒中患者院前延误时间及影响因素

魏坤, 张玲, 李芳芳, 董晴晴   

  1. 临泉县人民医院,安徽 阜阳 236400
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-26 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 董晴晴,E-mail:15715589321@163.com
  • 作者简介:魏坤(1990—),女,大学本科,主管护师,研究方向为脑卒中临床治疗观察
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度高校科学研究项目(KJ2021A1296)

Pre-hospital delay and its determinants among patients with acute ischemic stroke: An analysis based on Andersen's health service utilization behavior model

Wei Kun, Zhang Ling, Li Fangfang, Dong Qingqing   

  1. Linquan County People's Hospital, Fuyang, Anhui 236400, China
  • Received:2025-09-26 Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-06-05

摘要: 目的 以安德森模型为框架,系统分析急性缺血性卒中患者院前延误现况,从多维度探讨影响因素,为干预策略提供实证参考。方法 选取186例患者,以溶栓时间窗(4.5 h)分为延误组与未延误组。采用自设问卷收集资料,多因素logistic回归分析影响因素,并进行亚组及人群归因危险度(PAR%)分析。结果 共发放问卷186份,回收180份,有效回收率96.77%。180例患者院前延误时间45~720 min,平均(312.67±215.93)min,溶栓窗院前延误128例,未延误52例。多因素logistic回归分析显示,居住地农村(OR=2.798)、卒中知识知晓<3项(OR=3.326)、未呼叫120(OR=3.069)、NIHSS评分高(OR=2.520)、发作时无家属陪伴(OR=3.298)是影响因素(P<0.05)。亚组分析结果显示城市患者发病时无家属陪伴(OR=6.666)、NIHSS评分高(OR=4.618)与延误显著相关(P<0.05);农村患者仅卒中知识知晓<3项(OR=3.226)与延误显著相关(P<0.05);呼叫120患者NIHSS评分(OR=3.492)与延误显著相关(P<0.05);未呼叫120患者卒中知识知晓<3项(OR=4.215)及NIHSS评分(OR=2.217)均与延误显著相关(P<0.05)。人群归因危险度分析结果显示卒中知识知晓不足、未呼叫120、发病时无家属陪伴的PAR%分别为63.21%、57.14%、41.69%。结论 急性缺血性卒中患者院前延误率高,居住地、卒中知识知晓水平、呼叫120、神经功能缺损程度、发病时有无家属陪伴是主要影响因素。

关键词: 急性缺血性卒中, 院前延误, 影响因素, 卫生服务利用行为模型, 溶栓治疗时间窗, 卒中知识

Abstract: Objective To systematically analyze the current status of pre-hospital delay among patients with acute ischemic stroke and explore its multidimensional influencing factors within the framework of the Andersen model, thereby providing an empirical basis for intervention strategies. Methods A total of 186 patients were selected and dichotomized into a delay group and a non-delay group based on the thrombolytic time window (4.5 hours). Data were collected using a self-designed questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify influencing factors, supplemented by subgroup analyses and population attributable risk percentage (PAR%) calculations. Results Of the 186 questionnaires distributed, 180 were returned, yielding a valid response rate of 96.77%. The pre-hospital delay time for the 180 patients ranged from 45 to 720 minutes, with a mean of (312.67±215.93) minutes. Within this cohort, 128 patients experienced pre-hospital delay beyond the thrombolytic window, whereas 52 did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that rural residence (OR=2.798), knowledge of <3 stroke symptoms (OR=3.326), non-utilization of emergency medical services (EMS, i.e., not calling 120) (OR=3.069), a high National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR=2.520), and being unaccompanied by family at stroke onset (OR=3.298) were significant determinants of delay (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis indicated that for urban patients, being unaccompanied at onset (OR=6.666) and a high NIHSS score (OR=4.618) were significantly associated with delay (P<0.05). For rural patients, only knowledge of <3 stroke symptoms (OR=3.226) was significantly correlated with delay (P<0.05). Among patients who utilized EMS, a high NIHSS score (OR=3.492) was a significant predictor of delay (P<0.05). For those who did not utilize EMS, both knowledge of <3 stroke symptoms (OR=4.215) and a high NIHSS score (OR=2.217) were significantly associated with delay (P<0.05). The PAR% analysis demonstrated that insufficient stroke knowledge, non-utilization of EMS, and being unaccompanied at onset contributed 63.21%, 57.14%, and 41.69% to the risk of delay, respectively. Conclusion The rate of pre-hospital delay among patients with acute ischemic stroke is substantial. Key influencing factors include place of residence, level of stroke knowledge, utilization of emergency medical services, severity of neurological deficit, and the presence of family members at the time of stroke onset.

Key words: Acute ischemic stroke, Pre-hospital delay, Influencing factors, Health service utilization behavior model, Thrombolytic therapy time window, Stroke knowledge

中图分类号: 

  • R183.1