华南预防医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 422-427.doi: 10.12183/j.scjpm.2026.0422

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

骨质疏松性骨折患者跌倒风险感知的时间演变及影响因素

张宏玲, 郭晓霞, 潘李   

  1. 信阳市中心医院,河南 信阳 464000
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-30 出版日期:2026-04-20 发布日期:2026-05-08
  • 作者简介:张宏玲(1979—),女,大学本科,副主任护师,研究方向为骨科护理
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学适用技术跟踪项目GZ2023070

Temporal evolution and influencing factors of fall risk perception in patients with osteoporotic fractures

Zhang Hongling, Guo Xiaoxia, Pan Li   

  1. Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
  • Received:2025-10-30 Online:2026-04-20 Published:2026-05-08

摘要: 目的 探讨骨质疏松性骨折患者跌倒风险感知的时间演变及影响因素。方法 采用前瞻性研究设计,选取2023年1月—2024年10月收治的118例骨质疏松性骨折患者为研究对象,分别在出院时(T0)、出院后1个月(T1)、出院后3个月(T2)、出院后6个月(T3)、出院后12个月(T4)通过跌倒风险感知量表对患者进行随访调查,采用潜类别增长模型(LCGM)识别跌倒风险感知评分的变化轨迹,采用logistic回归分析跌倒风险感知评分发展轨迹的影响因素。结果 118例骨质疏松性骨折患者出院时(T0)、出院后1个月(T1)、出院后3个月(T2)、出院后6个月(T3)、出院后12个月(T4)的跌倒风险感知得分依次为(47.66±8.41)、(50.65±8.92)、(51.50±10.68)、(49.16±12.42)、(47.33±12.21)分;LCGM分析显示,118例骨质疏松性骨折患者跌倒风险感知评分分为3种变化轨迹,即类别1为持续低风险感知组(34例,占28.81%)、中度波动组(56例,占47.46%)和持续高风险感知组(28例,占23.73%)。有序多分类logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄<60岁(OR=3.559、4.311)、文化程度初中以上(OR=3.326、4.896)、有跌倒史(OR=2.985、4.180)、无抑郁(OR=2.888、2.804)、骨质疏松相关知识储备良好(OR=3.286、4.255)者更易进入中度波动组或持续高风险感知组(均P<0.05)。结论 骨质疏松性骨折患者的跌倒风险感知可随时间演变而呈不同变化轨迹。年龄、文化程度、跌倒史、抑郁及骨质疏松相关知识储备均是跌倒风险感知的影响因素。医护人员可关注不同轨迹人群的特征制定个体化干预方案,以提高跌倒风险感知水平。

关键词: 骨质疏松性骨折, 跌倒风险感知, 潜类别增长模型, 影响因素, 抑郁, 跌倒史

Abstract: Objective To investigate the temporal evolution of fall risk perception and its determinants in patients with osteoporotic fractures. Methods A prospective study design was employed, enrolling 118 patients with osteoporotic fractures admitted between January 2023 and October 2024. Patients were surveyed using the Fall Risk Perception Scale at five time points: at discharge (T0), and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) post-discharge. A latent class growth model (LCGM) was utilized to identify distinct trajectories of fall risk perception scores over time. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain the factors influencing these developmental trajectories. Results The mean fall risk perception scores for the 118 patients were (47.66±8.41) at T0, (50.65±8.92 )at T1, (51.50±10.68) at T2, (49.16±12.42) at T3, and (47.33±12.21) at T4. The LCGM analysis identified three distinct trajectories for fall risk perception scores: a "sustained low-risk perception" group (n=34, 28.81%), a "moderate fluctuation" group (n=56, 47.46%), and a "sustained high-risk perception" group (n=28, 23.73%). Ordinal multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that patients who were younger than 60 years (OR=3.559, 4.311), had an educational attainment of junior high school or higher (OR=3.326, 4.896), reported a history of falls (OR=2.985, 4.180), had no depression (OR=2.888, 2.804), or possessed a good knowledge of osteoporosis (OR=3.286, 4.255) were significantly more likely to belong to the moderate fluctuation or sustained high-risk perception groups (all P<0.05). Conclusion The perception of fall risk among patients with osteoporotic fractures follows distinct temporal trajectories. Age, educational attainment, history of falls, depression, and osteoporosis-related knowledge are significant determinants of these trajectories. Healthcare professionals should consider the specific characteristics of these different trajectory groups to develop tailored, individualized intervention strategies aimed at enhancing patients' perception of fall risk.

Key words: Osteoporotic fractures, Fall risk perception, Latent class growth modeling, Influencing factors, Depression, History of falls

中图分类号: 

  • R161.7