华南预防医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 113-118.doi: 10.13217/j.scjpm.2016.0113

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

绵阳市男男性行为人群同伴教育覆盖现状及影响因素分析

王毅1,李六林1,樊静2,赵西和1,张昭1,杨晓玲3,刘江4,任廷飞5,李伟6,笪旭辉7,杨干金8,王洪明9,贾秀伟10,廖平11   

  1. 1.绵阳市疾病预防控制中心,四川 绵阳621000 ;2.绵阳同志关爱小组;3.绵阳市涪城区疾病预防控制中心;4.江油市疾病预防控制中心;5.盐亭县疾病预防控制中心;6.安县疾病预防控制中心;7.绵阳市游仙区疾病预防控制中心;8.三台县疾病预防控制中心9.梓潼县疾病预防控制中心;10.北川羌族自治县疾病预防控制中心;11平武县疾病预防控制中心
  • 出版日期:2016-05-20 发布日期:2016-05-24
  • 作者简介:王毅(1964—),男,大学本科,主任医师,主要从事性病艾滋病防治工作

Status and influencing factors of MSM peer education in Mianyang

WANG Yi1, LI Liu-lin1, FAN Jing2, ZHAO Xi-he1, ZHANG Zhao1, YANG Xiao-ling3, LIU Jiang4, REN Ting-fei5, LI Wei6, DA Xu-hui7, YANG Gan-jin8, WANG Hong-ming9, JIA Xiu-wei10, LIAO Ping11   

  1. 1.Center for Disease Prevention and Control of Mianyang City, Mianyang 621000, China; 2. Comrade Mianyang Care Group;3. Fucheng District Center for Disease Control and Prevention 4.Jiangyou Center for Disease Control and Prevention;5.Yanting County Center for Disease Control and Prevention;6.Anxian County Center for Disease Control and Prevention;7.Youxian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention;8. Santai County Center for Disease Control and Prevention;9.Zitong County Center for Disease Control and Prevention;10. Beichuan Qiang Autonomous County Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 11. Pingwu County Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Online:2016-05-20 Published:2016-05-24

摘要: 目的了解男男性行为人群(MSM)艾滋病防治中同伴教育覆盖现状及其影响因素。方法2014年4—10月,以绵阳市辖区9县(市、区)MSM为对象,在固定场所在知情同意下应用滚雪球抽样法,进行调查对象招募和自填式匿名行为学调查和血清学检测。结果共调查1 097人,年龄中位数为23岁,高中、中专及以下文化程度569人(51.9%),未婚906人(82.6%)。近1年接受过同伴教育覆盖率为72.6%(796/1 097),HIV阳性率为3.8%(42/1 097),梅毒阳性率为5.9%(41/733)。近1年接受、未接受过同伴教育HIV感染率分别为2.4%(19/796)、7.6%(23/301),两者差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);梅毒感染率分别为5.2%(29/554)、6.7%(12/179),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。非条件logistic回归分析结果显示,调查对象接受同伴教育的可能性:户籍为本市其他县区、本省其他地区分别是本县区的0.390和0.420倍,认识当地MSM朋友数>10人是≤10人的4.591倍,寻找性伴范围为本市其他县区/省内其他地区是本县区的2.719倍,找性伴途径通过网络的是其他的0.510倍,近1周肛交次数≥2次是≤1次的2.280倍,近6月肛交有采取保护性措施是无保护者的4.228倍,HIV检测结果阳性是HIV阴性的0.186倍。结论MSM同伴教育覆盖率地区间不平衡,整体水平有待进一步提高。同伴教育有效促进了安全性行为,降低了HIV感染风险,应巩固加强。

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the covering status quo and influencing factors of the HIV/AIDS prevention services in peer education among men who have sex with men (MSM) . MethodsUsing snowball sampling method, MSM subjects were recruited to conduct self-administered anonymous behavior investigation and serological detection from April to October 2014 at a proper fixed location after informed consent in 9 counties (cities or districts) of Mianyang, Sichuan Province.ResultsA total of 1 097 MSM were investigated and their median age was 23 years. Among the participants, 569 cases(51.9%)had high school education level or below, 906 (82.6%) were unmarried. In the past one year, the coverage rate of peer education was 72.6% (796/1 097), the positive rate of anti-HIV was 3.8% (42/1 097), and the positive rate of syphilis was 5.9 % (41/733). The HIV infection rates were 2.4% (19/796) for MSM who received the peer education and 7.6% (23/301) for those who did not (P<0.01); the syphilis infection rates were 5.2%(29/554)and 6.7%(12/179)for the two groups of MSM, respectively (P>0.05). Unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that the possibility of accepted peer education for the participants whose domicile was other counties in this city or other areas in this province were 0.390 times or 0.420 times that for those whose domicile was in this counties/areas; the possibility of accepted peer education for the participants whose number of local MSM friends >10 was 4.591 times that for those whose number of local MSM friends ≤10; for the participants who sought sexual partners in other areas of this city/province was 2.719 times that of those who did it in the counties/areas where they were living; for the participants who sought sexual partners through the internet was 0.510 times that for those who did it through other ways; the participants who had anal sex ≥twice in the past one week was 2.280 times that for those who had anal sex less than once in the past one week; for the participants who had protected anal intercourse in the last 6 months was 4.228 times that for those who did not; and for the participants whose HIV test was positive was 0.186 time that for those whose HIV test was negative (all P<0.05). ConclusionThe coverage rate of MSM peer education was imbalanced in different areas. Peer education promoted awareness of HIV/AIDS knowledge and safe sex behavior effectively, reduced the risk of HIV infection, and should be strengthened.

中图分类号: 

  • R183.7