华南预防医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 149-154.doi: 10.12183/j.scjpm.2026.0149

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于真实世界数据的早期糖尿病肾病尿蛋白筛查频率卫生经济学比较研究

白琼, 王松, 唐雯, 王悦, 郑丹侠   

  1. 北京大学第三医院,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-26 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 通讯作者: 郑丹侠,E-mail:dxzheng@sina.com
  • 作者简介:白琼(1985—),女,博士研究生,副主任医师,研究方向为糖尿病肾病、急、慢性肾衰竭及心血管并发症
  • 基金资助:
    人才孵育基金(青年骨干)(BYSYFY2021025); 北京大学第三医院临床重点项目人才项目C类(BYSYZD2021036)

A comparative health economic analysis of proteinuria screening frequencies for early-stage diabetic kidney disease based on real-world data

Bai Qiong, Wang Song, Tang Wen, Wang Yue, Zheng Danxia   

  1. Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2025-08-26 Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-03-17

摘要: 目的 比较不同尿蛋白筛查频率对早期糖尿病肾病(DKD)患者临床效果及卫生经济学效益的影响。方法 基于北京大学第三医院2023—2024年早期糖尿病肾病患者电子病历数据,按尿蛋白筛查频率分为规范筛查组(每6个月1次)与低频筛查组(每年1次),采用Cox回归分析疾病进展风险,广义线性模型分析医疗成本,计算增量成本效果比(ICER)。结果 纳入规范筛查组206例和低频筛查组206例,规范筛查组疾病进展率显著低于低频筛查组,且无疾病进展生存时间显著长于低频筛查组(P<0.05)。经Cox比例风险回归模型校正混杂因素后,规范筛查组疾病进展风险显著低于低频筛查组(HR=1.768,95% CI:1.136~2.751,P=0.012)。规范筛查组各项医疗费用及累计直接医疗成本均高于低频筛查组(P<0.05)。经广义线性回归模型校正混杂因素后,规范筛查是早期DKD人均累计直接医疗成本增加的独立影响因素(OR=1.332,95% CI:1.320~1.345,P<0.001)。ICER估算显示,每多降低1个百分点位进展风险,需额外投入约988元医疗成本。规范筛查组肾脏复合终点事件总发生率显著低于低频筛查组,筛查总依从率、血糖及血压控制达标率则显著高于低频筛查组(P<0.05)。结论 在早期DKD患者中,每6个月1次的规律尿蛋白筛查虽会增加短期直接医疗成本,但能显著降低疾病进展风险、延缓进展速度、减少肾脏复合终点事件发生率,并有助于改善患者的血糖、血压控制水平。

关键词: 早期糖尿病肾病, 尿蛋白筛查, 筛查频率, 卫生经济学

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and health economic outcomes of different urinary protein screening frequencies in patients with early-stage diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods Based on electronic medical records of patients with early-stage DKD at Peking University Third Hospital from 2023 to 2024, this study stratified patients by screening frequency into a standard screening group (biannually) and a low-frequency screening group (annually). Cox regression analysis was employed to assess the risk of disease progression, while a generalized linear model was utilized to analyze medical costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was subsequently calculated. Results A total of 206 patients were included in each group. The disease progression rate was significantly lower, and the progression-free survival time was significantly longer in the standard screening group compared to the low-frequency screening group (P<0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors using a Cox proportional hazards model, the risk of disease progression remained significantly lower in the standard screening group (HR=1.768, 95% CI: 1.136-2.751, P=0.012). Various medical expenditures and the cumulative direct medical costs were higher in the standard screening group (P<0.05). Following adjustment with a generalized linear model, standard screening was identified as an independent predictor of increased per capita cumulative direct medical costs (OR=1.332, 95% CI: 1.320-1.345, P<0.001). The ICER estimation indicated that for each additional percentage point reduction in progression risk, an extra medical cost of approximately 988 RMB was incurred. The total incidence of the composite renal endpoint was significantly lower in the standard screening group, whereas overall screening compliance, glycemic control rates, and blood pressure control rates were significantly higher (P<0.05). Conclusion Among patients with early-stage DKD, regular biannual urinary protein screening, despite elevating short-term direct medical costs, significantly reduces the risk of disease progression, delays its rate, diminishes the incidence of composite renal endpoints, and contributes to the enhancement of glycemic and blood pressure control.

Key words: Early-stage diabetic kidney disease, Urinary protein screening, Screening frequency, Health economics

中图分类号: 

  • R587.2