华南预防医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 688-692.doi: 10.12183/j.scjpm.2022.0688

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

胰岛素强化治疗新诊断2型糖尿病患者成本-效果分析

卞巧1,2, 柯伟健3, 夏英华2, 张婉君2, 郑丹彤1,2, 曹蓉2, 刘烈华3, 李延兵3, 何群1,2   

  1. 1.南方医科大学公共卫生学院,广东 广州 510515;
    2.广东省疾病预防控制中心 广东省公共卫生研究院;
    3.中山大学附属第一医院
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-29 发布日期:2022-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 何群,E-mail:heq@gdiph.org.cn;李延兵,E-mail:liyb@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:卞巧(1995—),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事卫生政策与经济研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1314100); 广州市科技计划项目(202002020053)

Cost-effectiveness analysis of insulin intensive therapy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

BIAN Qiao1,2, KE Wei-jian3, XIA Ying-hua2, ZHANG Wan-jun2, ZHENG Dan-tong1,2, CAO Rong2, LIU Lie-hua3, LI Yan-bing3, HE Qun1,2   

  1. 1. School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    2. Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
    3. The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
  • Received:2022-01-29 Published:2022-08-12

摘要: 目的 分析3种胰岛素强化治疗方案的成本-效果,为选择临床治疗方案提供参考。方法 对新诊断2型糖尿病患者随机分为3组。A组仅给予持续皮下注射胰岛素(CSII),B组给予CSII联合二甲双胍和吡格列酮,C组给予CSII联合西格列汀。收集治疗前后的空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2hPG)、血糖达标时间、住院天数、低血糖发生次数及成本,比较3种方案的成本-效果。结果 各组患者经治疗后FPG、2hPG均下降(均P<0.01),3组的血糖达标时间、住院天数及低血糖发生次数差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。A、B、C组有效率的成本-效果比分别为139.37、134.29、135.66。以A组为对照,B组和C组的增量成本-效果比分别为25.52、53.85。敏感性分析支持基础分析结果。结论 CSII联合二甲双胍和吡格列酮治疗新诊断2型糖尿病患者是最经济、有效的方案;对于低血糖发生危险性高的患者,可选CSII联合西格列汀。

关键词: 新诊断2型糖尿病, 持续皮下胰岛素输注, 成本-效果, 联合用药

Abstract: Objective To analyze the cost-effectiveness of three kinds of different insulin intensive treatment regimes, and to provide a reference for the selection of clinical treatment regimens. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were randomly divided into three groups. Group A, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) alone; group B, CSII combined with metformin and pioglitazone; group C, CSII combined with sitagliptin. Fasting blood glucose (FPG) and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPG) before and after treatment, the days of reaching the target of blood glucose, the hospitalization days, the frequency of hypoglycemia, and the costs of the different regimes were recorded, and the cost-effectiveness of the three regimes was compared. Results All groups showed significantly decreased FPG and 2hPG post-treatment (all P<0.01), and the days of reaching the target of blood glucose, the hospitalization days, and the frequency of hypoglycemia among the three groups were statistically significant (all P<0.01). The cost-effectiveness ratio of the effective rate was 139.37, 134.29, and 135.66, respectively. Compared with group A, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for group B and group C were 25.52 and 53.85, respectively. The results of sensitivity analysis supported the results of basic analysis. Conclusion CSII combined with metformin and pioglitazone therapy is the most cost-effective treatment for newly diagnosed T2DM. For patients with a high risk of hypoglycemia, CSII combined with sitagliptin is available.

Key words: Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus, Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, Cost-effectiveness, Combination administration

中图分类号: 

  • R195