华南预防医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 567-571.doi: 10.12183/j.scjpm.2026.0567

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

消毒供应中心工作人员职业暴露风险及影响因素

朱洁, 栾佳琳, 姚英   

  1. 上海市同济医院, 上海 200065
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-15 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 姚英,E-mail:yaoying7309@163.com
  • 作者简介:朱洁(1979—),女,硕士研究生,主管护师,研究方向为消毒供应管理、院感管理
  • 基金资助:
    数字化手术室转型案例研究(GYZ2023SZ09)

Occupational exposure risks and influencing factors of central sterile supply department staff

Zhu Jie, Luan Jialin, Yao Ying   

  1. Tongji Hospital, Shanghai 200065, China
  • Received:2025-12-15 Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-06-05

摘要: 目的 调查消毒供应中心(CSSD)工作人员职业暴露风险及影响因素,探讨心理因素与职业暴露的关联。方法 采用简单抽样法抽取上海市3家二级及以上医院CSSD工作人员为调查对象开展问卷调查,内容涵盖一般人口学特征、职业暴露发生情况、职业暴露风险感知、职业防护知信行及焦虑、抑郁、职业倦怠等心理状态。采用描述性方法统计分析职业暴露现状,通过单、多因素logistic回归模型分析职业暴露的影响因素。结果 共回收有效问卷705份,其中298名发生职业暴露,发生率为42.27%。暴露类型以物理性暴露为主,其次为化学性、生物性暴露;职业暴露主要集中于去污区、灭菌区及检查包装区,去污区以锐器伤、生物性暴露为主,灭菌区以高温烫伤、噪声损伤为主,检查包装区以锐器伤为主。多因素logistic回归显示,工作年限6个月~1年(OR=3.596,95% CI:2.298~5.626)、去污区岗位(OR=2.388,95% CI:1.027~5.553)、每日工作时长> 10 h(OR=5.016,95% CI:2.747~9.160)、夜班班次(OR=1.977,95% CI:1.235~3.166)、未参加职业防护培训(OR=2.031,95% CI:1.358~3.039)是职业暴露发生的独立危险因素(均P< 0.05)。相关性分析显示,焦虑、抑郁、职业倦怠均与职业暴露发生率呈正相关,与职业暴露风险感知、职业防护知信行水平呈负相关(均P< 0.01)。结论 CSSD工作人员职业暴露发生率较高,工作年限6个月~1年、去污区岗位、每日工作时长> 10 h、夜班及未参加防护培训均为重要影响因素;焦虑、抑郁、职业倦怠与职业暴露发生密切相关。

关键词: 职业暴露, 消毒供应中心, 职业防护, 焦虑, 抑郁, 职业倦怠

Abstract: Objective To investigate the risk and influencing factors of occupational exposure among staff in the Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD), and to explore the association between psychological factors and occupational exposure. Methods A simple sampling method was used to select CSSD staff from three secondary and above hospitals in Shanghai for a questionnaire survey. The survey covered general demographic characteristics, occupational exposure, occupational exposure risk perception, knowledge‑attitude‑practice (KAP) regarding occupational protection, as well as psychological states including anxiety, depression, and job burnout. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the current status of occupational exposure, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify influencing factors. Results A total of 705 valid questionnaires were collected, of which 298 staff had experienced occupational exposure, with an incidence rate of 42.27%. Physical exposure was the most common type, followed by chemical and biological exposure. Occupational exposure was mainly concentrated in the decontamination area, sterilization area, and inspection/packaging area. In the decontamination area, sharp injuries and biological exposure predominated; in the sterilization area, high‑temperature burns and noise injuries were most common; and in the inspection/packaging area, sharp injuries were the main type. Multivariate logistic regression showed that working experience of 6 months to 1 year (OR=3.596, 95% CI: 2.298-5.626), working in the decontamination area (OR=2.388, 95% CI: 1.027-5.553), daily working hours >10 h (OR=5.016, 95% CI: 2.747-9.160), night shifts (OR=1.977, 95% CI: 1.235-3.166), and not receiving occupational protection training (OR=2.031, 95% CI: 1.358-3.039) were independent risk factors for occupational exposure (all P<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that anxiety, depression, and job burnout were positively correlated with the incidence of occupational exposure, and negatively correlated with occupational exposure risk perception and KAP scores regarding occupational protection (all P<0.01). Conclusion The incidence of occupational exposure among CSSD staff is relatively high. Working experience of 6 months to 1 year, working in the decontamination area, daily working hours >10 h, night shifts, and lack of protective training are important influencing factors. Anxiety, depression, and job burnout are closely associated with the occurrence of occupational exposure.

Key words: Occupational exposure, Central Sterile Supply Department, Occupational safety, Anxiety, Depression, Job burnout

中图分类号: 

  • R153