华南预防医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 333-337.doi: 10.13217/j.scjpm.2016.0333

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

指数综合修改模式在城际轨道车站验收卫生检测结果评价中的应用

王芳,赵丽,于莹莹,杨振,古婷   

  1. 1. 暨南大学医学院,广东 广州510632; 2. 深圳市宝安区疾病预防控制中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-30 出版日期:2016-08-20 发布日期:2016-10-24
  • 作者简介:王芳(1974—),女,大学本科,副主任医师,主要从事卫生检测与评价工作

Application of modified integrated index model in evaluation of hygienic detection results of newly-built urban rail transit stations

WANG Fang, ZHAO Li, YU Ying-ying, YANG Zhen, GU Ting   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Shenzhen 518054,China;2.School of Public Health,University of South China;
  • Received:2016-03-30 Online:2016-08-20 Published:2016-10-24

摘要: 目的通过对某城际轨道4个车站卫生检测结果进行评价,探讨指数综合修改模式对新建轨道交通车站等公共场所综合卫生评价的可行性与适用性。方法根据GB 9672—1996和WS 394—2012的要求确定评价指标和评价标准,按WS/T 199—2001中的指数综合修改模式对广东省某城际轨道4个新建车站的检测结果(含温度、一氧化碳、二氧化碳、空气中可吸入颗粒物、空气细菌总数、送风细菌总数、送风真菌总数及站内环境清洁程度,新风口、空调过滤器、冷却塔、送风口、回风口、机房等部位的清洁程度等指标)进行综合评价。结果广东省某城际轨道4个车站中B站的集中空调送风真菌总数和C站的空气细菌总数和集中空调送风细菌总数不合格,现场卫生调查结果中C站的站内环境清洁度、新风口、空调过滤器和机房评分均为50分。指标综合修改模式计算结果显示,A、B、C、D 4个车站的综合指数分别为1.00、1.58、1.94和1.19,卫生等级除A站为Ⅱ级合格外,其他3个均为Ⅲ级较差。结论指数综合修改模式可用于轨道交通车站的卫生状况评价,此方法实现了全面总体的等级评定和分级排序。

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and applicability of modified integrated index model (MIIM) for evaluation of hygienic detection results of newly-built rail transit stations.MethodsIndexes and criteria for evaluation were determined according to GB 9672-1996 and WS 394-2012. MIIM described in WS/T 199-2001 was used to comprehensively evaluate detection results (including temperature, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, inhalable particulate matter [PM] in the air, total bacterial count [TBC] in the air, TBC in the supply air, total fungal count [TFC] in the supply air in the supply air, environmental cleanliness, and cleanliness of fresh-air inlet, filters, cooling tower, return air opening, air outlet, and machine room) of four newly-built high-speed railway and inter-city stations in a city of Guangdong Province. ResultsAmong the four stations, the TFC in the supply air of the central air conditioning system in Station B, and TBC in the air of Station C and in the supply air of central air conditioning system in Station C were unqualified. Field hygiene survey results showed that the average score was 50 points for the environmental cleanliness, fresh-air inlet, filters, and machine room in C station. The analysis results of MIIM showed that the comprehensive indices of four stations, A, B, C, and D were 1.00, 1.58, 1.94, and 1.19, respectively. The hygiene rating was qualified for Station A as Grade II, but not qualified for the other three as Grade III.ConclusionMIIM achieved the overall rating and classification sorting and can be used to evaluate the hygiene status of rail transit stations.

中图分类号: 

  • R128