华南预防医学 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 7-11.doi: 10.13217/j.scjpm.2014.0007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

广州市社区女性乳腺癌患者焦虑抑郁状况及其影响因素研究

刘颖芝1,2,周琴,谢玉婷,陈淑明,曾彦珺,骆习之,罗曼1,2,吴晓燕   

  1. 1.广州医科大学,广东 广州 510182;2.广州市疾病预防控制中心
  • 收稿日期:2013-09-12 出版日期:2014-02-20 发布日期:2014-03-03
  • 通讯作者: 周琴 E-mail:cristy_autumnh@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘颖芝(1991—),女,本科在读,研究方向:预防医学
  • 基金资助:
    广州市医药卫生科技项目(20121A011113)

Anxiety and depression in women with breast cancer and influencing factors in Guangzhou City

LIU Ying-zhi, ZHOU Qin, XIE Yu-ting, CHEN Shu-ming, ZENG Yan-jun, LUO Xi-zhi, LUO Man, WU Xiao-yan.   

  1. 1. Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182,China;2. Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Received:2013-09-12 Online:2014-02-20 Published:2014-03-03

摘要: 目的 了解广州市社区女性乳腺癌患者出院后的焦虑和抑郁情况,分析其相关影响因素。方法 [采用多阶段整群抽样方法抽取广州市内包括昌岗、沙园、晓港等16个社区在内的所有满足条件的乳腺癌患者(2010—2012年确诊并经过治疗且调查时未住院的广州市户籍乳腺癌患者)进行问卷调查。调查问卷内容包括患者的人口学资料、诊疗信息、患者肿瘤家族史、经济状况,以及焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)。采用单因素卡方检验和多因素logistic回归分析患者的人口学特征、诊疗信息、肿瘤家族史等因素对乳腺癌患者焦虑、抑郁状况的影响。结果 共发出问卷260份,回收有效问卷245份,有效率为94.2%。被调查乳腺癌患者平均年龄为(57.2±11.7)岁,高中及以上文化程度占50.6%(124/245),以正常退休人群为主,占57.1%(140/245)。调查对象的焦虑标准分平均为(35.7±7.7)分,高于国内常模的(29.78±10.07)分(P <0.01),焦虑患者占被调查人数的28.6%(70/245);调查对象的抑郁平均粗分为(38.7±9.2)分,抑郁患者占被调查人数的49.0%(120/245)。多因素非条件logistic回归表明,相对于无治疗副作用的乳腺癌患者,不管是1~2种,还是3种及以上副作用的患者,其发生焦虑、抑郁状况的风险更高(焦虑:OR =21.9、12.2;抑郁:OR =6.2、4.8);相对于希望家人/亲朋好友支持的患者,希望医生支持的患者更容易发生焦虑(OR =2.2);相对于医生不重视的、无癌症家族史的患者,医生重视、有癌症家族史的患者发生抑郁风险更低(OR均为0.4)。结论 广州社区女性乳腺癌患者焦虑抑郁率较高。应加强对患者的医学指导和心理干预,降低患者治疗副作用,提高医生对患者的支持力度,加强患者对于癌症相关治疗的了解,以降低乳腺癌患者的焦虑抑郁等心理问题。

Abstract: Objective To determine status of anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients after being discharged in community in Guangzhou and analyze their influencing factors. Methods Women who were not inpatient after being diagnosed with breast cancer and treated between 2010 and 2012 were recruited from 16 communities in Guangzhou using multistage cluster sampling for questionnaire survey. Contents of the questionnaire included demographic and clinical information, tumor family history, economic and psychological status, as well as self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The Chi square test and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 245 questionnaires were recovered, with a recovery rate of 94.2% (245/260). The average age of patients was (57.2±11.7) years old. Of the patients, 50.6% (124/245) had the educational level of high school and above and 57.1% (140/245) were retirees. The average standard score of anxiety was (35.7±7.7), higher than the national norm (29.78±10.07) (P<0.01). The average crude score of depression was (38.7±9.2). The proportion of breast cancer patients with anxiety and depression were 28.6% (70/245) and 49.0% (120/245), respectively. Non-conditional logistic regression showed that 1-2 and more than 3 kinds of treatment side effects were risk factors of both anxiety and depression compared with no treatment side effects (anxiety: OR=21.9, 12.2; depression: OR=6.2, 4.8). A wish to obtain support from physicians was risk factor of anxiety relative to the one from family/friends (OR=2.2). However, more attention from physicians and family history of cancer were protective factors of depression for breast cancer patients comparing to those with less physician’s attention and without family history of cancer (both ORs=0.4). Conclusion The rates of anxiety and depression were higher in breast cancer patients in Guangzhou. We suggest to enhance the medical guidance and psychological intervention, reduce side effects of treatment, and improve the ability of patients to participate in social work, and increase communication between physicians and patients to reduce anxiety, depression, and other psychological problems.

中图分类号: 

  • R737.9