华南预防医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 218-222.doi: 10.13217/j.scjpm.2016.218

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用德尔菲法构建自然灾害后传染病疫情发生风险评估指标体系

旷翠萍1,2,代吉亚3,易建荣3,宋铁3,侯杰1,4,王军5,李国平6   

  1. 1.广东省现场流行病学培训项目,广东 广州 511430;2. 深圳市罗湖区疾病预防控制中心;3.广东省疾病预防控制中心;4.梅州市梅县区疾病预防控制中心;5.广州市海珠区疾病预防控制中心;6.吴川市疾病预防控制中心
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-23 出版日期:2016-07-20 发布日期:2016-08-03
  • 作者简介:旷翠萍(1981—),女,硕士研究生,主管医师,从事传染病预防控制工作及相关研究

Risk assessment index system for outbreak of infectious diseases after natural hazard by Delphi method

KUANG Cui-ping1,2, DAI Ji-ya3,YI Jian-rong3,SONG Tie3, HOU Jie1,4, WANG Jun5, LI Guo-ping.   

  1. 1.Guangdong Field Epidemiology Training Program, Guangzhou 511430,China;2.Shenzhen Luohu Center for Disease Control and Prevention;3. Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention;4. Meixian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention;5. Haizhu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention;6. Wuchuan City Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • Received:2015-11-23 Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-08-03
  • Contact: 国家卫生和计划生育委员会公益性行业科研项目(201302003) E-mail:1478749538@qq.com

摘要: 目的应用德尔菲法构建自然灾害后传染病疫情发生风险评估指标体系,为灾后快速评估疫情发生风险,有针对性地开展传染病防控工作提供参考。方法通过文献检索法和专题讨论,形成指标体系框架;通过2轮专家咨询,采用界值法进行评估指标的筛选,确定指标体系一级、二级指标,采用百分权重法对一级指标进行赋权,采用乘积法对二级比值进行赋权。结果30名专家的2轮咨询表的积极系数第1轮为96.67%,第2轮为100.00%。专家权威程度在0.65~0.95之间,均值为0.83。7项一级指标算术平均值为4.12~4.88,71项二级指标算术平均值为3.14~4.76。一级指标变异系数均<0.18,二级指标变异系数均<0.30。第1轮肯德尔系数为0.334,第2轮为0.478。结论初步建立较完善的自然灾害后传染病疫情发生风险评估指标体系。本指标体系结构合理,内容全面,涵盖影响灾后传染病疫情发生的主要因素。

Abstract: ObjectiveTo establish a risk assessment index system for outbreak of infectious diseases after natural hazard.MethodsTwo rounds of Delphi consultation were held among 30 experts on infectious disease prevention and control to determine the first-level and second-level indexes, and the index weights.ResultsThe active coefficients of specialist authority were 96.67% (29/30) and 100.00%(30/30) in the two round consultations, respectively. The authority coefficients of experts ranged from 0.65 to 0.95 and the mean value was 0.83. The mean values of the 7 first-level indexes and 71 second-level indexes were 4.12-4.88 and 3.14-4.76, respectively. The coefficients of variation were < 0.18 for the first-level indexes and < 0.30 for the second-level indexes. Kendall's coefficients of concordance were 0.334 for the first round of consultation and 0.478 for the second round.ConclusionRisk assessment index system for outbreak of infectious diseases after natural hazards established in the study is reasonable and comprehensive, covering the main factors influencing the occurrence of infectious diseases after natural hazard.

中图分类号: 

  • R183