华南预防医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (8): 829-834.doi: 10.12183/j.scjpm.2025.0829

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

慢性心力衰竭患者疲劳异质性研究及与预后相关性分析

赵会会, 刘洋洋, 张艳   

  1. 安徽中医药大学附属太和中医院,安徽 阜阳 236600
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-11 出版日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2025-09-16
  • 通讯作者: 张艳,E-mail: 13615679696@139.com
  • 作者简介:赵会会(1990—),女,大学本科,主管护师,研究方向:内科护理学
  • 基金资助:
    2023年度阜阳市卫生健康科研项目(FY2023-060)

Fatigue heterogeneity in patients with chronic heart failure and its correlation with prognosis

ZHAO Huihui, LIU Yangyang, ZHANG Yan   

  1. Taihe Hospital affiliated to Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Fuyang, Anhui 236600, China
  • Received:2025-01-11 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-09-16

摘要: 目的 分析慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的潜在疲劳类别,并探讨其与临床指标及预后的关联,为制定分层管理策略奠定理论基础。方法 选取2021年1月至2023年10月安徽中医药大学附属太和中医院诊治的CHF患者110例。采用潜在剖面分析(LPA)法分析患者疲劳潜在类别。比较不同疲劳类别患者临床资料及预后情况,多因素logistic回归分析疲劳异质性的影响因素。结果 LPA结果显示,3分类模型(低、中、高疲劳组)的赤池信息量准则(AIC)、贝叶斯信息量准则(BIC)和调整贝叶斯信息量准则(aBIC)最低(6 977.902/7 058.563/6 988.798),熵值为0.831,主对角线概率均>90%,交叉分类概率≤7.5%,符合高分类可靠性要求。低疲劳组27例(24.55%),总分(42.39±6.83)分;中度疲劳组49例(44.55%),总分(61.67±6.93)分;高度疲劳组34例(30.91%),总分(77.91±6.56)分。无序多分类logistic回归分析结果显示,失眠严重程度指数(ISI)(OR=2.845)和广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7(GAD-7)得分(OR=1.892)是高度疲劳的相关因素,射血分数(OR=0.650、0.505)和多维度感知社会支持量表(MSPSS)得分(OR=0.785、0.209)是中度疲劳和高度疲劳的相关因素(均P<0.05)。随访1年,预后结局显示显著梯度差异:低疲劳组的全因死亡率(3.70%)、心力衰竭再住院率(14.81%)和复合终点事件(死亡或再住院)发生率(18.52%)最低;中度疲劳组相应发生率分别为10.20%、24.49%和30.61%;而高度疲劳组则显著升高,分别达到26.47%、50.00%和61.76%,组间差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。结论 CHF患者的疲劳异质性可明确划分为低、中、高3个特征性亚组。失眠、焦虑等心理症状及较低的社会支持水平与高疲劳程度显著相关,且高疲劳组患者预后最差,应基于疲劳分层实施个体化管理以改善临床结局。

关键词: 慢性心力衰竭, 疲劳, 潜在剖面分析, 症状异质性, 预后评估, 心理症状

Abstract: Objective To analyze the potential fatigue categories of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), and explore their correlation with clinical indicators and prognosis, laying a theoretical foundation for the development of stratified management strategies. Methods This study enrolled 110 patients diagnosed with CHF at Taihe Hospital between January 2021 and October 2023. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), a person-centered statistical approach, was employed to identify distinct latent classes of fatigue among the patient cohort. Comparative analyses of clinical data and prognostic outcomes were conducted across these fatigue classes, and multinomial logistic regression was utilized to ascertain the determinants of fatigue heterogeneity. Results The LPA results indicated that a three-class model (low, moderate, and high fatigue groups) provided the optimal fit, as demonstrated by the lowest values for the akaike information criterion (AIC; 6 977.902), bayesian information criterion (BIC; 7 058.563), and sample-adjusted BIC (aBIC; 6 988.798). The model exhibited high classification reliability, with an entropy value of 0.831, average posterior probabilities on the main diagonal exceeding 90%, and cross-classification probabilities of ≤7.5%. The cohort was classified into a low-fatigue group (n=27, 24.55%; mean total score=42.39±6.83), a moderate-fatigue group (n=49, 44.55%; mean total score=61.67±6.93), and a high-fatigue group (n=34, 30.91%; mean total score=77.91±6.56). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the insomnia severity index (ISI; OR=2.845) and the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7; OR=1.892) were significant correlates of the high-fatigue profile. Furthermore, ejection fraction (OR=0.650、0.505) and the multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS; OR=0.785、0.209) were identified as significant factors associated with both the moderate- and high-fatigue profiles (all P<0.05). Over a one-year follow-up period, prognostic outcomes exhibited a significant gradient across the groups. The low-fatigue group demonstrated the lowest rates of all-cause mortality (3.70%), rehospitalization for heart failure (14.81%), and composite endpoint events (death or rehospitalization, 18.52%). These rates were intermediate in the moderate-fatigue group (10.20%, 24.49%, and 30.61%, respectively) and were substantially elevated in the high-fatigue group (26.47%, 50.00%, and 61.76%, respectively). The differences between the groups were statistically significant (all P<0.01). Conclusions The heterogeneity of fatigue in patients with CHF can be distinctly classified into three characteristic subgroups: low, moderate, and high. Psychological symptoms, such as insomnia and anxiety, alongside diminished levels of social support, are significantly correlated with a higher degree of fatigue. Moreover, the high-fatigue group is associated with the poorest prognosis. Individualized management should be implemented based on fatigue stratification to improve clinical outcomes.

Key words: Chronic heart failure, Fatigue, Latent profile analysis, Symptom heterogeneity, Prognostic evaluation, Psychological symptoms

中图分类号: 

  • R195