唐山市社区成年居民脑卒中相关知识认知现状及影响因素分析

doi:10.12183/j.scjpm.2022.0429

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析社区居民脑卒中防控相关知识认知现状及影响因素。方法于2020年10月采用方便抽样方法在唐山市辖区内分别抽取1个区、县级市和县,每个区（县）分别各抽取1个社区（村）,抽中社区（村）的全体成年常住居民作为调查对象进行脑卒中相关知识调查,采用描述性分析方法对居民脑卒中知识掌握情况进行分析,并采用单、多因素分析方法对居民脑卒中知识影响因素进行分析。结果本研究共获得唐山市社区居民有效问卷1 342份,男性685人,女性657人,年龄18~84岁,平均（42.51±19.14）岁。脑卒中防控相关知识认知量表评分的总分为（27.69±5.13）分,总体得分率为38.89%。脑卒中基础知识得分为（18.25±4.25）分、脑卒中诱发因素（4.86±1.00）分、脑卒中危险因素识别（4.77±0.96）分、脑卒中发病后急救处置知识（1.98±0.65）分,得分率从高到低分别为脑卒中诱发因素、脑卒中基础知识、脑卒中危险因素识别和脑卒中发病后急救处置知识,分别为45.45%、42.86%、38.46%、33.33%。年龄较大（β'=0.137）、受教育程度较高（β'=0.119）、职业为工人、干部和专业技术人员（β'=0.201）、脑卒中病史/脑卒中家族史阳性（β'=0.261、0.143）、相关慢性病史阳性（β'=0.267）、接受过脑卒中相关知识健康教育（β'=0.328）的社区居民脑卒中防控相关知识认知水平较高。结论唐山市社区居民的脑卒中防控相关知识认知有待提高,积极地提升社区健康教育是有效提升居民脑卒中防控相关知识认知水平的有效方法。

关键词: 社区居民, 脑卒中, 认知, 危险因素, 脑血管疾病

Abstract: Objective To analyze the cognitive status and its influencing factors of stroke prevention and control-related knowledge among community residents. Methods In October 2020, the convenient sampling method was used to select one district, county-level city, and county, respectively, in the jurisdiction of Tangshan, and one community （village） was selected from each district （county）. All adult permanent residents of the community （village） were investigated stroke-related knowledge. The descriptive analysis method was used to analyze the residents' mastery of stroke knowledge, and univariate and multivariate analysis methods were used to analyze the influencing factors. Results A total of 1 342 valid questionnaires were obtained from community residents in Tangshan City, including 685 males and 657 females, aged 18-84 years, with an average of （42.51±19.14） years old. The total score on the stroke prevention and control-related knowledge cognition scale was （27.69±5.13）, and the scoring rate of the total score was 38.89%. The score of basic knowledge of stroke was （18.25±4.25）, stroke-inducing factors was （4.86±1.00）, identifying risk factors of stroke was （4.77±0.96）, and knowledge of emergency treatment after stroke was （1.98±0.65）. The scoring rates from high to low were stroke-inducing factors, basic knowledge of stroke, identifying risk factors of stroke, and knowledge of emergency treatment after stroke, which was 45.45%, 42.86%, 38.46%, and 33.33%, respectively. Older age （β'=0.137）, higher education level （β'=0.119）, workers,cacles and professional technicians （β'=0.201）, stroke history/positive family history of stroke （β'=0.261、0.143）, positive history of related chronic diseases （β'=0.267）, and who have received stroke-related knowledge and health education （β'=0.328） had a higher level of knowledge about stroke prevention and control. Conclusion The cognition of stroke prevention and control-related knowledge of community residents in Tangshan needs to be improved. Actively improving community health education is an effective way to effectively improve the cognition level of stroke prevention and control-related knowledge of residents.

Key words: Community residents, Stroke, Cognition, Risk factor, Cerebrovascular disease

中图分类号:

R197.3

王卫亮, 郝志慧, 崔建伟, 沈天舒, 唐启群. 唐山市社区成年居民脑卒中相关知识认知现状及影响因素分析[J]. 华南预防医学, 2022, 48(4): 429-432.

WANG Wei-liang, HAO Zhi-hui, CUI Jian-wei, SHEN Tian-shu, TANG Qi-qun. Cognitive status and its influencing factors of stroke-related knowledge among adult community residents in Tangshan[J]. South China Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2022, 48(4): 429-432.

参考文献

[1] 《中国脑卒中防治报告》编写组.《中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2020,17(5):272-281.
[2] 江滨. 脑卒中后并发症流行特征分析及对基层管理优化建议[J]. 中国全科医学,2021,24(12):1445-1453.
[3] 王陇德. 中国脑卒中防控要有战略与战术[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2012,41(2) : 1-2.
[4] 李海磊. 强制性运动干预配合任务导向性训练对脑卒中恢复期老年患者运动耐力及跌倒效能的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2021,41(5):1006-1009.
[5] 姜虹,赵青华,杨水利,等. 多学科团队协作的延续性干预对急性脑卒中患者焦虑抑郁情绪及康复的影响[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志,2021,24(5):442-448.
[6] 王玲,黄晓哲,刘雪娥,等. 强化心理疏导结合个体化睡眠干预对脑卒中后睡眠障碍患者的效果[J]. 国际精神病学杂志,2021,48(2):381-384.
[7] 《中国脑卒中防治报告 2019》编写组. 中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要中国脑卒中防治报告 2019》编写组 . 中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2020,17(5):52-61.
[8] 陈伟伟,高润霖,刘力生,等《中国心血管病报告2017》概要[J].中国循环杂志,2018,33(1):1-8.
[9] 刘冬梅,刘婷婷. 北京某社区脑卒中高危人群重点危险因素干预10年后效果分析[J]. 中国健康教育,2020,36(9):848-850.
[10] 葛佳楠,黄花. 医院-社区-家庭医疗联体管理模式下健康教育在急性脑卒中患者中的干预价值[J]. 中国医药导报,2021,18(1):180-183,188.
[11] 盛海兵, 张蓉. 社区人群脑卒中高危因素及相关认知功能筛查探讨[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50(10):1614-1616.
[12] 周兆凡,吴锡桂. 心血管病流行病学调查方法手册[M]. 北京: 北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1997: 102-106.
[13] 邓石凤,周雯莉,肖姗,等. 广州市社区高血压患者的脑卒中预防知识及影响因素的调查[J]. 现代临床护理,2013(1):1-6.
[14] 李爱东,黄宗青,刘洪涛,等. 脑卒中患者及家属对脑卒中与康复相关知识、态度和行为水平的调查[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2009,15(3):252-254.
[15] 健康中国行动推进委员会. 健康中国行动(2019—2030年):总体要求重大行动及主要指标[J]. 中国循环杂志 ,2019,34(9): 846-858.
[16] 王思源,蒙清云,刘雨薇,等.武陵山片区居民脑卒中一级预防知识知晓度及相关影响因素分析[J].现代医药卫生,2022,38(2):227-230.
[17] 常丽英,何小明,曹学兵,等.脑卒中防治科普宣教专家共识[J].卒中与神经疾病,2021,28(6):713-718.
[18] 代晨阳,魏强,计海霞,等.合肥市一社区脑卒中高危人群危险因素筛查分析[J]. 安徽医科大学学报,2021,56(1):148-152.
[19] 王琼,赵伟,王元姣. 脑卒中危险因素分析及预测模型的构建[J]. 浙江临床医学,2021,23(2):162-164,168.
[20] 冯慧,王晓光,赵华,等. 中老年人群脑卒中风险评估及其危险因素相关性分析[J]. 中华保健医学杂志,2021,23(5):480-484.
[21] 肖维春,唐晓君,陈敏,等.上海市奉贤区初中生对心肺复苏的知识态度现状及对策研究[J].华南预防医学,2021,47(5):686-689.