华南预防医学 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 226-229.doi: 10.13217/j.scjpm.2017.0226

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

广东省食品安全状况评价指标体系构建研究

吴为,顿中军,江金女,郑婵娇,陈子慧   

  1. 广东省疾病预防控制中心 广东省公共卫生研究院,广东 广州 511430
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-19 修回日期:2017-01-19 出版日期:2017-07-15 发布日期:2017-08-02
  • 通讯作者: 陈子慧 E-mail:23458475@qq.com
  • 作者简介:吴为(1980—),男,硕士研究生,主管医师,主要从事食品安全卫生研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    2015年广东省科技计划项目(项目编号:2015A030401055)

Establishment of evaluation index system on food safety in Guangdong Province

WU Wei, DUN Zhong-jun, JIANG Jin-nv, et al   

  1. Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430,China
  • Received:2017-01-19 Revised:2017-01-19 Online:2017-07-15 Published:2017-08-02

摘要: 目的构建一套适合广东省实际情况的食品安全状况综合评价指标体系,为今后科学、快速评估广东省食品安全状况提供依据。方法采用德尔菲(Delphi)法进行2轮专家咨询,确立广东省食品安全状况综合评价指标体系的指标组成;通过Fussy综合评判法计算确定指标权重系数。结果第1轮专家咨询调查的专家共19人,从事食品安全相关工作年限平均(19.1±7.0)年,副高级及以上职称的专家有12人(占63.2%)。第2轮共18人,从事食品安全相关工作年限平均(18.9±7.8)年,副高级及以上职称的专家有13人(占72.2%)。第1、2轮回收率分别为73.1%、94.7%,专家判断依据平均得分为0.925分,熟悉程度平均得分为0.805分,专家的权威程度得分为0.865分。经过2轮咨询,初步建立了广东省食品安全状况评价指标体系,其包括“政府管理上的投入” 、“食品安全现状”、“相关企业质量” 、“宣传教育”和“公众满意度” 5个一级指标和17个二级指标。5个一级指标的权重系数在0.190~0.209之间;17个二级指标的权重系数在0.024~0.200之间。结论本研究得到的广东省食品安全指标体系在专家意见协调度、专家权威程度、专家积极性等表现良好,可为广东省的食品安全状况评价工作提供评价依据。

Abstract: ObjectiveTo construct a comprehensive evaluation index system of food safety status and to provide a basic scientific method for rapid assessment of food safety in Guangdong Province.MethodsDelphi method was used with two rounds of expert consultation to screen and establish comprehensive indexes for evaluating food safety status. Weight coefficient of the indexes was computed by Fussy comprehensive evaluation method.ResultsNineteen experts conducted the first round of expert consultation survey. They were engaged in food safety related work for (19.1±7.0) years, 12 of them (63.2%) with senior or associate-senior professional titles. There were 18 experts in the second round, who were engaged in food safety related work for (18.9±7.8) years and 13 of whom (72.2%) had senior or associate-senior professional titles. The recovery rates were 73.1% for the first round and 94.7% for the second one.The expert judgment based on the average score was 0.925, the familiarity was 0.805, and the degree of the expert authority was 0.865.After two rounds of expert consultations, index system of food safety evaluation in Guangdong Province was established, including 5 first-level indicators and 17 second-level ones. The five first-level indicators were the Government investment in management,Food safety status,Relevant enterprise quality,Publicity andeducation, and Public satisfaction. The weight coefficients were between 0.190 and 0.209 for the five first-level indicators and between 0.024 and 0.200 for the 17 second-level ones.ConclusionThe food safety indicator system established in the study was well performed in the coordination degree of the expert opinion, the expert authority, and expert enthusiasm, and could be applied for the comprehensive evaluation of food safety in Guangdong Province.

中图分类号: 

  • TS201.6